[<--] Indice [-->]

From Raistlin <raistlin@s0ftpj.org>
Date Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:22:04 -0700
Subject Re: [hackmeeting] si e' rotto il TCP 

Alpt wrote:

>>>Anyone who recommends responding to a RST packet, does not
>>>understand TCP very well.

E su questo...

> This "vulnerability" as they call it has nothing new: around 1996, I've
> played with a tool named "juggernaut" which exploited this TCP feature to
> close sessions. 

Non c'entra non dico niente, ma meno di niente.

> That's what I was discussing with a collegue of mine. I was wondering if
> a cisco always uses the same ports (or nearly the same) after a reboot,
> in which case the source port range to be swept would be reduced.

E' una delle parti dell'articolo di Watson... interessante come ci sia 
sempre un sacco di gente che wondera senza leggere :)

-- 
Raistlin

S0ftPj - Digital Security for Y2K

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT/TW d++(-) s++:-- a--  C++++ U++++ P(---) L+++ E----
W+++ N++ o K+ w--- O- M-- V-- PS++ PE- Y++ PGP++ t+++ 5+
X+@ R+++ tv-- b+++ DI++++ D++ G+ e+++>++++(*) h! r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

_______________________________________________
hackmeeting mailing list
hackmeeting@lists.papuasia.org
http://brr.papuasia.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hackmeeting
[<--] Indice [-->]